FOREIGN OWNERSHIP OF
KANSAS LAND DEBATE
It was indeed a spirited hearing before the Senate Federal and State Affairs committee over Senate Bill(SB) 446, which prohibits ownership interests in Kansas lands by foreign nationals, foreign businesses, and foreign governments unless authorized by a new State Land Council. This bill was filed by the Committee Chairperson, Sen. Mike Thompson, at the request of the Attorney General. This issue had real debates in the last session through the introduction of three bills that were not passed. There were two days of interim hearings on this topic in September. Now, there are two dueling bills –SB 446 and House Bill(HB) 2638 (that was introduced by House Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee chair Rep. Ken Rahjes but referred to the House Commerce, Labor and Economic Development Committee). While SB 446 restricts all foreign ownership over 3 acres without an exemption from the Council,HB 2638 targets just the six foreign adversary countries (China, Cuba, Russia, North Korea, Iran, Venezuela ) listed now by the United States Secretary of State.
The Attorney General was in rare form arguing the merits of SB 446 as an improvement over the bills from last session. The parcel size was lowered from ten acres to three acres. States can regulate aliens from owning land, but the AG argues a blanket restriction is more defensible in court compared to just selecting certain countries or foreign nationals. Having this State Land Council (comprised of the AG, Governor, Secretary of State, KBI director, and the Adjutant General) will provide exemptions, giving Kansas a more direct role in key land acquisitions. Today, the reporting on foreign land ownership is self-reported to USDA, which questions the reliability of the data. Kansas is the only breadbasket rural state with no existing restrictions, while 24 states have some restrictions (with three having complete bans). The AG is as worried about foreign drug cartels as foreign governments in buying land for grower operations (as is happening in Oklahoma, Texas and California). One key instance is in Johnson County, where Cnanao Technology USA (which is China-based) has been given $34 million in tax incentives along with Industrial Revenue Bonds for an eight-acre site with 112 employees. This $94.7 million manufacturing plant will make liquid conductive paste used in products such as cell phones and vehicle batteries.
Testimony of Attorney General Kris Kobach Proponent for SB 446
The opponents to SB 446 came ready for the fight. The Kansas Farm Bureau (KFB) was the first to testify. KFB is prepared to discuss national security risks and how to protect Kansas and the nation. But this bill is simply governmental overreach. This issue is better settled at the federal level. This bill creates more government by giving a ‘State Land Council’ with the ability to decide who can and cannot own land in Kansas. There are no standards set for this Council in this bill. This is an open threat to private property rights. The second opponent was the Kansas Livestock Association (KLA). KLA supports free markets. Modern multinational agricultural operations are diverse, with diverse capital structures. Debt financing often comes from foreign sources. According to USDA reports, 32% of foreign-owned agricultural land is held by Canadians, followed by the Netherlands at 12%, Italy at 6%, the UK at 6%, and Germany at 5%. China is less than 1% (with the ownership of Smithfield Foods – raising one-fifth of all American hogs - accounting for 41% of Chinese holdings). Also in opposition were the Kansas Corn Growers, the Kansas Chamber of Commerce and the Kansas Bankers Association.
Testimony John Donley, KFB - Testimony opposing SB 446 – establishing the state land council
Aaron M. Popelka, V.P. of Legal and Governmental Affairs, Kansas Livestock Association - SB 446 AN ACT concerning real property; relating to certain lands; prohibiting the acquisition of ownership interests in such lands by foreign nationals, foreign businesses and foreign governments unless authorized by the state land council; creating the state land council and providing for its membership, powers and duties.
SENATE BILL No. 446
HOUSE BILL No. 2638
|